Effect of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis on hematologic toxicity in patients receiving chemoradiation for primary brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Diffuse gliomas are managed with radiation and temozolomide; however, this therapy often results in hematologic toxicities. Patients undergoing chemoradiation also risk contracting Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), and frequently receive prophylaxis against PJP during treatment. Independent of chemoradiation, some PJP prophylaxis drugs have the potential to cause myelosuppression, which could require cessation of chemotherapy. Here, we evaluate differences in the frequency of hematologic toxicities during chemoradiation when patients receive PJP prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated patients with primary brain tumors treated with radiation and concurrent temozolomide. Analyses were performed to assess the effect of the type of PJP prophylaxis on risk for neutropenia, lymphopenia, or thrombocytopenia and the severity of these adverse effects as defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Of the 217 patients included in this analysis, 144 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and 69 received pentamidine. Of the patients who received TMP/SMX, 15.3% developed an absolute neutrophil count < 1500 cells/µL compared with 7.2% of patients receiving pentamidine (p = 0.10). Platelet count < 100,000/µL occurred in 18.1% of patients who received TMP/SMX and 20.3% of patients who received pentamidine (p = 0.70). No significant differences in lymphocyte counts between therapies were seen. Severity of hematologic toxicities were similar between PJP prophylaxis groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the type of PJP prophylaxis does not significantly affect the risk for hematologic toxicity in brain tumor patients receiving radiation and temozolomide. Additional studies are merited to evaluate the higher rate of neutropenia in patients on TMP/SMX observed in this study.

A regimen based on the combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caspofungin and corticosteroids as a first-line therapy for patients with severe non-HIV-related pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a life-threatening and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. A synergistic regimen based on the combination of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) with caspofungin and glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) may be a potential first-line therapy for PJP. Therefore, it is important to explore the efficacy and safety of this synergistic therapy for treating non-HIV-related PJP patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of 38 patients with non-HIV-related PJP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Patients were divided into two groups: the synergistic therapy group (ST group, n = 20) and the monotherapy group (MT group, n = 18). All patients were from the ICU and were diagnosed with severe PJP. In the ST group, all patients were treated with SMX-TMP (TMP 15-20 mg/kg per day) combined with caspofungin (70 mg as the loading dose and 50 mg/day as the maintenance dose) and a GCS (methylprednisolone 40-80 mg/day). Patients in the MT group were treated only with SMX-TMP (TMP 15-20 mg/kg per day). The clinical response, adverse events and mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a positive clinical response in the ST group was significantly greater than that in the MT group (100.00% vs. 66.70%, P = 0.005). The incidence of adverse events in the MT group was greater than that in the ST group (50.00% vs. 15.00%, P = 0.022). Furthermore, the dose of TMP and duration of fever in the ST group were markedly lower than those in the MT group (15.71 mg/kg/day vs. 18.35 mg/kg/day (P = 0.001) and 7.00 days vs. 11.50 days (P = 0.029), respectively). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or duration of hospital stay between the MT group and the ST group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMZ/TMP monotherapy, synergistic therapy (SMZ-TMP combined with caspofungin and a GCS) for the treatment of non-HIV-related PJP can increase the clinical response rate, decrease the incidence of adverse events and shorten the duration of fever. These results indicate that synergistic therapy is effective and safe for treating severe non-HIV-related PJP.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in a Patient on Concomitant Treatment with Levetiracetam and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole.

BACKGROUND Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and levetiracetam are commonly prescribed medications in the treatment of infections and seizures, respectively. Despite their known efficacy, each has a reputation for triggering severe and sometimes life-threatening cutaneous adverse drug reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Although the mechanism of such cutaneous adverse drug reactions cannot be fully explained, it is thought to be a type IV T cell and NK cells-mediated hypersensitivity reaction that leads to keratinocyte apoptosis and epidermal necrosis. It is also thought that cutaneous adverse drug reactions are also linked to a patient's genetic predispositions, especially the human leukocyte antigens profiles and the N-acetyl transferase 2 phenotypic variation. CASE REPORT We describe a case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a severely ill 51-year-old man who was treated in an outside health care facility simultaneously with Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and levetiracetam. The patient presented to our Emergency Department with Stevens-Johnson syndrome believed to possibly be related to the combination of these 2 agents. CONCLUSIONS The concomitant use of Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and levetiracetam might have been responsible for heightening the potential of these 2 medications to trigger an unfortunate adverse drug reaction, but no formal culprit was able to be identified and no in vivo study was performed, due to ethical considerations. Thus, through this case report we strive to increase awareness of the potential risk of simultaneously prescribing these 2 medications.

In Situ Patch Test and Repeated Open Application Test for Fixed Drug Eruption: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated allergy workup in fixed drug eruption (FDE) in a large population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of a standardized allergy workup for diagnosing the cause of FDE, with a focus on in situ repeated open application tests (ROATs). METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the practice of conducting a complete allergy workup for the etiological diagnosis of FDE. It consisted of 3 steps: in situ patch tests (PTs) for all cases except pure mucosal involvement, followed by in situ ROAT if in situ PT results were negative, and finally a drug challenge (DC). The in situ ROAT involved daily application of the suspected drug on a previously affected FDE site for 7 days. RESULTS: Of 98 suspected FDE cases, 61 patients (median age 61 y; male-to-female ratio 1.8) with a complete allergy workup were included. In 4 cases, even the DC yielded negative results. Among the remaining 57 patients with a positive workup, implicated drugs included paracetamol (12 cases), ß-lactams (11 cases), imidazoles (9 cases, including 5 with metronidazole), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8 cases), iodinated contrast media (4 cases), cotrimoxazole (3 cases), and various other drugs in 10 patients. The diagnosis was confirmed by in situ PT in 17 of 54 cases (31.5%), in situ ROAT in 14 of 40 cases (35%) (with 4 cases showing remote reactivation of FDE sites), and DC in 26 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential allergy workup involving successively in situ PT, in situ ROAT, and DC is a reliable and safe method for diagnosing the cause of FDE. In situ tests exhibited a sensitivity of over 50%.

Low-Dose vs Conventional-Dose Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Treatment for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Patients Not Infected With HIV: A Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is an effective treatment for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in immunocompromised patients with and without HIV infection; however, a high incidence of adverse events has been observed. Low-dose TMP-SMX is a potentially effective treatment with fewer adverse events; however, evidence is limited. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the efficacy and safety of low-dose TMP-SMX for non-HIV PCP compared with conventional-dose TMP-SMX after adjusting for patient background characteristics? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we included patients diagnosed with non-HIV PCP and treated with TMP-SMX between June 2006 and March 2021 at three institutions. The patients were classified into low-dose (TMP < 12.5 mg/kg/d) and conventional-dose (TMP 12.5-20 mg/kg/d) groups. The primary end point was 30-day mortality, and the secondary end points were 180-day mortality, adverse events grade 3 or higher per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, and initial treatment completion rates. Background characteristics were adjusted using the overlap weighting method with propensity scores. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients in the low-dose group and 81 in the conventional-dose group were evaluated. In the overall cohort, the average age was 70.7 years, and the proportion of women was 55.1%. The average dose of TMP-SMX was 8.71 mg/kg/d in the low-dose group and 17.78 mg/kg/d in the conventional-dose group. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (6.7% vs 18.4%, respectively; P = .080) or 180-day mortality (14.6% vs 26.1%, respectively; P = .141) after adjusting for patient background characteristics. The incidence of adverse events, especially nausea and hyponatremia, was significantly lower in the low-dose group (29.8% vs 59.0%, respectively; P = .005). The initial treatment completion rates were 43.3% and 29.6% in the low-dose and conventional-dose groups (P = .158), respectively. INTERPRETATION: Survival was similar between the low-dose and conventional-dose TMP-SMX groups, and low-dose TMP-SMX was associated with reduced adverse events in patients with non-HIV PCP.

Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention is Well-Tolerated Without Inducing Resistance: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) maximizes reoperation-free survival. We evaluated SAT after DAIR of acutely infected primary TJA regarding: 1) adverse drug reaction (ADR)/intolerance; 2) reoperation for infection; and 3) antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) DAIR for acute periprosthetic joint infection at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were identified (n = 115). Data were collected on patient demographics, infecting organisms, antibiotics, ADR/intolerances, reoperations, and antibiotic resistances. Median SAT duration was 11 months. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify covariates significantly associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were 11.1 and 16.3% of TKA and THA DAIR patients, respectively, who had ADR/intolerance to SAT. Patients prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P = .0014) or combination antibiotic therapy (P = .0169) after TKA DAIR had increased risk of ADR/intolerance. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between TKA (83.3%) and THA (65.1%) DAIR (P = .5900) at mean 2.8-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation for infection was higher among TKA Staphylococcus aureus infections (P = .0004) and lower with increased SAT duration (P < .0450). The optimal duration of SAT was nearly 2 years. No cases of antibiotic resistance developed due to SAT. CONCLUSIONS: Consider SAT after TJA DAIR due to improved reoperation-free survival and favorable safety profile. Prolonged SAT did not induce antibiotic resistance. Use trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caution because of the increased likelihood of ADR/intolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis, causes of discontinuation and thrombocytopenia observed during administration: A single-center retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The development of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) has recently become a growing concern; thus, its prevention has become increasingly important. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST) is a cost-effective first-line and prophylactic treatment for PCP. However, ST administration criteria for PCP prophylaxis remain unclear and are often discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the causes of ST discontinuation and the associated AEs using objective data. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 162 patients admitted to Kansai Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020, who received ST for PCP prophylaxis. We compared clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and incidence of AEs between ST non-discontinuation and ST discontinuation groups. Additionally, we divided the patients into non-developing and developing thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) groups based on the investigation results. RESULTS: No patients developed PCP while receiving ST. The most common causes of ST discontinuation were thrombocytopenia (37%), liver dysfunction (20%), and rash (18%). Multivariate analysis revealed thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) as a factor significantly associated with ST discontinuation. Furthermore, we identified three factors correlated with thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1): age ≥50 years, lymphocyte count <1000/µL, and platelet count <180,000/µL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the aforementioned factors are at higher risk of developing thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) during ST administration for PCP prophylaxis. Therefore, platelet count monitoring is essential to enhance safety and efficacy of ST treatment. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to explore additional implications and interventions.

Drug-induced secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in hairy cell leukaemia.

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, aggressive, excess immune activation syndrome. Diagnosis can be challenging due to its several clinical mimics including sepsis. There are multiple aetiologies of HLH; in adults, it is most commonly triggered by infection, malignancy, drugs and autoimmune processes. Failure to rapidly diagnose and treat this condition can be fatal. The management of HLH includes identifying and removing the trigger, supportive management and immunosuppression. Identifying the trigger is essential to inform the most appropriate type of immunosuppression. Here, we report a case of likely drug-induced HLH in a patient recently treated for hairy cell leukaemia. The culprit drug was thought to be co-trimoxazole and this case report highlights a very rare complication of this commonly used drug. We discuss our management approach with steroid monotherapy and withdrawal of co-trimoxazole.

Simultaneous hypersensitivity reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanate in a dog.

Antibiotics are known to be able to cause hypersensitivity reactions through various mechanisms. We present a case of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) and anaphylactic shock occurring simultaneously in a dog after the administration of two classes of antibiotics, namely trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC). The patient recovered completely from DITP on discontinuation of TMP-SMX and the anaphylactic shock caused by AMC was treated with intensive care. DITP is a rare adverse drug reaction (ADR), and anaphylactic shock is a life-threatening ADR. This is the first case report of a dog manifesting two types of hypersensitivity reactions caused by two antibiotics.

Indication for a Pneumocystis Prophylaxis Therapy in Patients with Vascular Anomalies Treated with PIK3/AKT/mTOR Pathway Inhibitors: Experts' Opinion and Systematic Review from the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Vascular anomalies (VAs) are increasingly being treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors. These drugs have immunosuppressive properties and thus theoretically overexpose patients to opportunistic infections, especially Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). PJP prophylaxis use lacks consensus. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of PJP in patients receiving mTOR/PI3K/AKT inhibitors for VAs and determine any indication for pneumocystis prophylaxis in this population. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 parts: (1) we sent a survey to a panel of international experts of VAs asking about their use of pneumocystis prophylaxis drugs and (2) we performed a systematic review of the literature of all published cases of patients receiving these drugs for VA to estimate the prevalence of PJP in this population. RESULTS: Answers from 68 experts were analyzed: 21 (30.9%) answered they always add PJP prophylaxis when prescribing mTOR inhibitors, 20 (29.4%) case-by-case, and 27 (39.7%) never. For the systematic review, among 3,053 reports screened, 217 were included involving 1,189 patients (1,143 received sirolimus, 38 everolimus, 4 alpelisib, 4 miransertib). Among the 1,189 cases, 2 (0.2%) PJP were reported: one under sirolimus and one under everolimus. Thus, the prevalence of PJP was estimated at 0.88 cases/1,000 patients under sirolimus (95% CI: -0.84 to 2.59) and 26.31 cases/1,000 under everolimus (95% CI: -24.58 to 77.18). Patients with PJP never received prophylaxis drugs. We found no PJP cases under alpelisib and miransertib. PJP prophylaxis was given in 218 (18.3%) cases, more frequently for children (91.3 vs. 77.2% in the non-prophylaxis group, p = 0.012), mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (186 patients, 85.3%). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that even if PJP is a rare event, it may occur in patients with VAs treated with an mTOR inhibitor. Although our results cannot allow for revising guidelines, prophylaxis with TMP-SMX might be appropriate for a subgroup of patients with risk factors for PJP.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Co-Trimoxazole-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.

BACKGROUND: Co-trimoxazole has been reported as a common culprit drug for various cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). However, information on genotypic and phenotypic characteristics is still limited. We aimed to study clinical characteristics, genetic suitability, laboratory findings, and treatment outcomes in patients with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR and determine variables associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR during October 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and laboratory investigation with an emphasis on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and HLA-DRB1 results linked to subtypes of cutaneous adverse reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 38.0 ± 14.6 years old, and 72% were female. Subtypes of reactions included maculopapular eruption (MPE; 56.9%), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS; 23.6%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS; 12.5%), fixed drug eruption (4.2%), and urticaria (2.8%). Characteristics that were significantly associated with SCARs included male gender (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.04-8.75), HIV infection (OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.13-10.75), prophylactic use of co-trimoxazole (OR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.54-15.57), and co-trimoxazole administration longer than 10 days (OR = 7.65, 95% CI: 2.57-22.78). HLA-B*38:02 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced SJS, while HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, and HLA-DRB1*12:01 were associated with co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS. HLA-B*52:01 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced MPE. CONCLUSIONS: Co-trimoxazole could induce various phenotypes of CADRs. Genotypic and phenotypic factors that may potentially predict co-trimoxazole-induced SCARs include male gender, HIV infection, prophylactic and prolonged drug use, as well as the presence of HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*38:02, or HLA-DRB1*12:01 alleles.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*13:01 screening for the prevention of co-trimoxazole-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions among HIV-infected patients in Thailand.

Studies found a strong association between HLA-B*13:01 allele and co-trimoxazole-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Genetic screening before initiation of co-trimoxazole may decrease the incidence of co-trimoxazole-induced SCARs. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*13:01 screening before co-trimoxazole initiation in HIV-infected patients in Thailand. A combination of a decision tree model and a Markov model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes of two strategies including 1) HLA-B*13:01 screening before co-trimoxazole initiation and 2) usual practice from a societal perspective. Alternative drugs are not considered because dapsone (the second-line drug) also presents a genetic risk. Input parameters were obtained from literature, government documents, and part of the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD). One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analyses were performed to determine robustness of the findings. HLA-B*13:01 screening resulted in 0.0061 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) loss with an additional cost of 370 THB ($11.84). At the cost-effectiveness threshold of 160,000 THB ($5,112.85), the probability of the genetic screening strategy being cost-effective is 9.54%. This analysis demonstrated that HLA-B*13:01 allele screening before initiation of co-trimoxazole among HIV-infected patients is unlikely to be cost-effective in Thailand. Our findings will help policymakers make an evidence-informed decision making.

Prevalence of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Adverse Reaction Mislabelling in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is an important antibiotic, with the most compelling indications for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment. Previous adverse reactions (AR) to TMP-SMX may limit the usability of TMP-SMX. Electronic medical record (EMR) of AR for other antibiotics has previously been shown to be inaccurate; however, the extent to which this occurs for TMP-SMX is unknown. METHODS: A multi-centre retrospective observational study was conducted for consecutive inpatient admissions over a 2.5-year period commencing 2020. Adverse reactions to TMP-SMX recorded in the EMR were collected and reviewed by two independent medical officers using pre-defined expert criteria for the classification of allergies and intolerances. RESULTS: TMP-SMX AR were present in the EMR of 759 individuals (prevalence 0.6%). The majority were labelled as allergy (725, 95.5%) rather than intolerance (34, 4.5%). Most common AR were rash, vomiting, and swelling. When classified against the gold-standard expert criteria, there were 437 allergies (57.6%) and 159 intolerances (21.0%). Overall, the number of incorrect EMR AR labels was 133/759 (17.5%). Both medical and surgical specialties had significant numbers of patients with TMP-SMX AR labels and incorrectly classified EMR AR labels. CONCLUSION: TMP-SMX AR labels affect inpatients admitted under multiple specialty units. The user-entered categorization as allergy or intolerance labels in EMRs are frequently used incorrectly. These incorrect labels may inappropriately contraindicate the use of TMP-SMX, and formal evaluation of TMP-SMX ARs with immunological assessment and relabelling where appropriate may increase the use of this agent.

A Case That Will Take Your Breath Away: Acquired Methemoglobinemia Related to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Phenazopyridine Ingestion for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and phenazopyridine are individually associated with methemoglobinemia through a series of altered reduction-oxidation reactions. We report a case of methemoglobinemia associated with concurrent use of TMP/SMX and phenazopyridine in a 70-year-old woman with recurrent urinary tract infections. She presented to the emergency department for worsening back pain in the setting of recurrent urinary tract infections, concerning for pyelonephritis. During her workup, she became acutely hypoxic. The emergency department provider suspected the presence of abnormal hemoglobin. An arterial blood gas showing elevated levels of methemoglobinemia confirmed the suspicion. The combined use of TMP/SMX and phenazopyridine was thought to be the likely etiology of hypoxia. This case highlights the importance of medication management in the geriatric population, as well as the judicious use of antibiotics for urinary tract infections-a common chief complaint in the primary care setting.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pediatric Osteoarticular Infections.

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is active against most Staphylococcus aureus isolates but is not widely used for the treatment of pediatric osteoarticular infections. METHODS: This was a comparative effectiveness study of hospitalized patients ≤18 years treated with TMP-SMX vs. other antibiotic regimens for acute osteoarticular infections between 2016 and 2021 at 3 hospitals using inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score analysis. The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of unanticipated emergency department (ED) or outpatient visits, hospital readmissions, extension, or change of antibiotic therapy due to inadequate clinical response, or death, all within 6 months after completing antibiotics. The secondary outcome was antibiotic-associated adverse events (AEs) within 6 months. The exposed group for the treatment failure analysis included children who received ≥7 days of TMP-SMX and did not experience treatment failure while on another antibiotic. Children receiving at least 1 dose of TMP-SMX were the exposed group for the AE analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients met eligibility criteria; 26 (22.4%) patients were classified into the TMP-SMX cohort and 90 (77.6%) into the other antibiotics cohort (most commonly clindamycin, vancomycin, and cefazolin). There was no significant difference in treatment failure between TMP-SMX and other antibiotics (43% vs. 19%; 95% CI .9-10.4). More patients in the TMP-SMX cohort experienced an unplanned ED or outpatient visit (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-17.8). There was no difference in hospital readmission, antibiotic change, or duration extension. Exposure to TMP-SMX was associated with more AEs (41% vs. 19%, P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with TMP-SMX was not associated with greater clinical failure but was associated with more AEs compared to alternative agents for the treatment of pediatric acute osteoarticular infections.

Efficacy and safety of co-trimoxazole in eradication phase of melioidosis; systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. The two stages of melioidosis treatment are the intense intravenous phase and the oral eradication phase. Although co-trimoxazole has been in use for several years, the literature does not demonstrate uniformity of the drug doses, combinations, or durations suitable for the eradication phase of melioidosis. The safety profile of co-trimoxazole was not documented in the literature, nor have systematic studies of its effectiveness been done. This systematic review sought to study on the dose, duration and combination of co-trimoxazole therapy in view of clinical efficacy and safety in the eradication phase of melioidosis. MAIN BODY: This systematic review included all of the published articles that employed co-trimoxazole in the eradication phase after 1989, including, randomized clinical trials, case-control studies, cohorts, case reports, and case series. Throughout the eradication (maintenance) phase, co-trimoxazole usage was permissible in any dose for any period. A total of 40 results were included in the analysis which contained six clinical trials, one cohort study, one Cochrane review, and thirty-two case series/case reports. Clinical and microbial relapse rates are low when co-trimoxazole is used in single therapy than in combination. There were several adverse events of co-trimoxazole, however, a quantitative analysis was not conducted as the data did not include quantitative values in most studies. SHORT CONCLUSION: The dose of co-trimoxazole, duration of the eradication phase, and other combinations used in the treatment was varying between studies. Compared to combined therapy patients treated with co-trimoxazole alone the mortality and relapse rates were low. The lowest relapse rate and lowest mortality rate occur when using co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice daily. The duration of therapy varies on the focus of melioidosis and it is ranged from 2 months to one year and minimum treatment duration associated with low relapse rate is 3 months. The use of co-trimoxazole over the maintenance phase of melioidosis is associated with clinical cure but has adverse effects.

Anti-tumor activity of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against melanoma skin cancer through triggering allergic reaction and promoting immunity.

The anti-cancer impact of an allergic reaction is strongly linked to immunity enhancement. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), an antibiotic, has potential immunomodulatory effects, but has side effects such as allergies. Thus far, the effects and underlying mechanisms of TMP-SMX in melanoma have not been clarified. This study examined the potential roles of TMP-SMX in melanoma skin cancer using an immunodeficient mouse model. TMP-SMX significantly improved the survival rate and reduced the tumor weight and growth and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in melanoma skin cancer of immunodeficient mice. In the forced swimming test, TMP-SMX significantly reduced immobility time compared to the melanoma skin cancer of immunodeficient mice, indicating improved immunity. TMP-SMX significantly increased infiltration of mast cells and release of allergy-related mediators (IgE, histamine, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-33) and immune-enhancing mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-12). In addition, the administration of TMP-SMX significantly increased the caspase-3, 8, and 9 activities. Furthermore, mice given TMP-SMX showed no adverse reactions according to the blood biochemical parameters. TMP-SMX significantly inhibits the growth of melanoma skin cancer by triggering an allergic reaction and promotingimmunity. Hence, we propose that TMP-SMX may be used as an immune booster in cancer chemotherapy.